Before I go into the explaining the question, I would like
to clarify couple of things. Firstly, being
genetic and being inherited. If we say
something is genetic that doesn’t means it’s inherited. But if we say something
is inherited means it’s genetic. In
other words, if I say that some trait is genetic that doesn’t mean it will be
inherited. For example, our eye color is inherited, which means it’s genetic.
Secondly, In my
discussion with Dr. L.S. Shashidhara couple
of days back, I rose the same question which we all are pondering upon. Is
intelligence genetic? He told me I should understand that, this question
has different meaning in different context.
According to him, Biologists
look at intelligence as the ability of the brain to receive and process
information. Biological basis of all learning and memory is dependent on how
the brain is formed and developed (formation of neuronal network). Since all
biological phenomenon are controlled by gene products (while at the same time
influenced by the environment), one can say there is genetic basis for
intelligence too. This doesn’t mean that
intelligence is inherited.(As I have explained the difference between being
genetic and inherited).
Educationists and
social science people look at intelligence as ability to learn in schools and
learn modern knowledge. This is largely dependent on learning environment, like
peer group, teachers, teaching/learning methods etc.
Furthermore, new neuronal connections are made during our childhood. This is an evolutionarily-adapted strategy to prepare the brain depending on which environment you live. So a kid's ability to perceive and process information is more dependent on environment than genetic factors. The latter is important for the ability of neurons to send out their axons and to make synapses(.for more details) That is primary requirement.
Furthermore, new neuronal connections are made during our childhood. This is an evolutionarily-adapted strategy to prepare the brain depending on which environment you live. So a kid's ability to perceive and process information is more dependent on environment than genetic factors. The latter is important for the ability of neurons to send out their axons and to make synapses(.for more details) That is primary requirement.
http://www.nature.com/mp/journal/v16/n10/full/mp201185a.html
,this paper says intelligence is a multigenic trait(depends on functioning of
many genes). Any such trait will show more variations than single
gene-regulated traits(which is dependent on functioning of one gene). The
probability that children inherit genetic ability of parents to learn and
process information is very low. Mathematically speaking - we can say it is
inheritable. But in real world, it has such low probability, the environmental
influence masks genetic influence.
According to me, we cannot separate the environmental and
genetic factor because environment also affects our genetic makeup. This is
precisely Darvin’s Theory of Evolution. For example, we all know that we don’t
have a tail unlike our ancestors (more precisely genetically very closely
related species have tails). This means that because we were not using our tail
for long time (many generations) it got removed from our genetic makeup.
Finally, I would like to say that YES, in biological terms
intelligence is genetic but it’s environment which dominates and mostly it’s
environmental factor which matters because environmental factor can affect our
genetic makeup. That is why I say that environment and genetic factors cannot
be separated.
No comments:
Post a Comment